Asus tuf 3080 андервольтинг



Asus tuf 3080 андервольтинг

По результатам многочисленных обзоров нового GPU Ampere противоборствующие мнения пользователей пришли к компромиссному заключению — скачок производительности RTX 3080 сопоставим с тем, что демонстрировала архитектура Pascal после Maxwell, особенно в сценариях с использованием RT и тензорных ядер, однако энергопотребление игрового флагмана немного огорчает. GPUReport поспешили выяснить на примере референсной Founders Edition возможно ли остудить пыл новинки, улучшив показатели энергоэффективности. Для достижения поставленной задачи ГП подвергли андервольтингу (агл. undervolting) — принудительному понижению напряжения на чип, посредством поиска минимально возможных значений с сохранением стабильной работы на максимально допустимой частоте.

реклама

Тестовому экземпляру удалось добиться хороших значений в 1800 Мгц при 800 мВ (милливольт или 0.800 В). Для этого в OC Scanner потребовалось произвести несколько простых действий : снижение базовой частоты ядра на 291 Мгц и поднятие частоты в выбранной координате напряжений на 240 Мгц с последующим применением показателей в панели MSI Afterburner

Дальнейшие результаты игрового бенчмарка The Division 2 говорят за себя. Тестирование проводилось в разрешении 4К с близкими к максимальным значениям настройками графики. Итоги крайне положительные — производительность осталась на прежнем уровне, демонстрируя отклонения от стоковых значений на уровне погрешности. При этом энергопотребление в среднем удалось сократить на 50 Вт, что привело к снижению температуры чипа на 2-3 градуса.

Первые данные о манипуляциях с вольтажом обнадеживают, но, разумеется, требуют более глубокого изучения с расширенным набором игр и тестов, а также формирования репрезентативной выборки испытуемых экземпляров. Наверняка многие энтузиасты хотели бы рассчитывать на еще более впечатляющие частоты в разогнанных партнерских картах, но в практическом выражении это не дает очевидных преимуществ, по крайней мере пока. Похоже, что чипы Ampere с завода получили свой максимум и не способны с повышением частот без расширения лимитов и использования жидкого азота продемонстрировать хоть сколько-нибудь значимый прирост. Что же, продолжаем следить за поступлением свежей информации от немногочисленных на текущий момент владельцев RTX 3080

Источник

3080TI undervolting advice?

1mongus

I’m just a bit confused as to why I have to increase my core clock to +125 before messing with the curve? I’m not overclocking since my GPU is factory overclocked and I don’t want to mess with it for hours to get a 0.5fps boost, so is increasing the core clock to +125 necessary for the undervolt? Does the amount of voltage I should lower it to depend on what my core clock is?

If you’re wondering what I’m referring to in the guide, there’s a link that shows what I’m talking about here:

SPECS:
MB: Gigabyte Z690 UD DDR4
RAM: Patriot Viper Steel 2x16gb 3600mhz DDR4
CPU: i5-12600k
GPU: Gigabyte RTX 3080ti Gaming OC 12G
SSD: Samsung 790 EVO 2TB
OS: Windows 11

looniam

System Name loon v4.0
Processor i7-11700K
Motherboard asus Z590TUF+wifi
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory ballistix 3600 cl16
Video Card(s) eVga 3060 xc
Storage WD sn570 1tb(nvme) SanDisk ultra 2tb(sata)
Display(s) cheap 1080&4K 60hz
Case Roswell Stryker
Power Supply eVGA supernova 750 G6
Mouse eats cheese
Keyboard warrior!
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/21765182 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1114767

its not about another .5 fps but getting the most out of what you’re undervolting to.

however never knew i had to, because i don’t always. though fwiw, some nut jobs save undervolt/+clockspeeds profiles for different games.

ir_cow

The goal is to get the highest frequency with the lowest voltage. In that video, after editing the clock curve, the voltage is now capped at 925mv (0.925v). If left alone the video card will peak frequency at 1980Mhz. However the Curve is only working off NVIDIA boost. This means that the frequency is governed by voltage, temperature and total power draw allowed. By undervolting it, you use less power, generate less heat and therefore if done correctly can achieve a decent clock frequency at a lower power draw.

Regardless of your curve, the GPU still needs X voltage to reach X frequency. So you might be able to for example reach 1900 Mhz with .900mv, but 2000Mhz would need 1.05v. These numbers aren’t exact, but you get the point.

Performance Enthusiast
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage Samsung 970 Evo m.2 NVME
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Zowie EC1-A
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
Software case populated with Artic P12’s

There are multiple ways to undervolt, that is one method where you up the core clock, and lower the maximum power target. I use a method where you pick one spot in the curve to be your top clock and can leave power untouched.

CTRL+F brings up the voltage curve. What I do is then hold CRTL and grab a point and drag the entire line down, then choose your undervolt target point, lets say its 825mv, drag that single point up to the desired speed, lets say 1830mhz and hit apply on the main MSI AB window, every point to the right of the one you applied should now be a flat line.

Companies like NVIDIA need to design and ship the cards with settings that work for absolutely everyone. So they need to have a clock/voltage curve that errs on the side of caution for stabilities sake. This does not take into account individual GPU variances and your win in the ‘silicone lottery’. It’s very easy with Ampere cards to achieve stock performance with a good undervolt.

1mongus

There are multiple ways to undervolt, that is one method where you up the core clock, and lower the maximum power target. I use a method where you pick one spot in the curve to be your top clock and can leave power untouched.

CTRL+F brings up the voltage curve. What I do is then hold CRTL and grab a point and drag the entire line down, then choose your undervolt target point, lets say its 825mv, drag that single point up to the desired speed, lets say 1830mhz and hit apply on the main MSI AB window, every point to the right of the one you applied should now be a flat line.

Companies like NVIDIA need to design and ship the cards with settings that work for absolutely everyone. So they need to have a clock/voltage curve that errs on the side of caution for stabilities sake. This does not take into account individual GPU variances and your win in the ‘silicone lottery’. It’s very easy with Ampere cards to achieve stock performance with a good undervolt.

The goal is to get the highest frequency with the lowest voltage. In that video, after editing the clock curve, the voltage is now capped at 925mv (0.925v). If left alone the video card will peak frequency at 1980Mhz. However the Curve is only working off NVIDIA boost. This means that the frequency is governed by voltage, temperature and total power draw allowed. By undervolting it, you use less power, generate less heat and therefore if done correctly can achieve a decent clock frequency at a lower power draw.

Regardless of your curve, the GPU still needs X voltage to reach X frequency. So you might be able to for example reach 1900 Mhz with .900mv, but 2000Mhz would need 1.05v. These numbers aren’t exact, but you get the point.

nguyen

System Name The de-ploughminator
Processor I7 9900K @ 5.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 5
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Neo 3600mhz 15-15-15-30
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 + Bitspower WB
Storage Plextor 512GB nvme SSD
Display(s) LG OLED CX48″
Case Lian Li 011D Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-5
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software Win10

Best way to explain undervolting is you can get the same Clocks with lower voltage, therefore keeping the same performance but using less power.

Let say at default, your 3080Ti reach a stable clocks of 1950mhz @ 950mV, undervolting it down to 1950Mhz @ 850mV would reduce the power consumption by 50-70W, making your card run cooler&quieter.

Here is 3090 at stock

Here is undervolting (-125mV)

Performance Enthusiast
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage Samsung 970 Evo m.2 NVME
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Zowie EC1-A
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
Software case populated with Artic P12’s

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64

agent_x007

System Name BOX
Processor Core i7 6950X @ 4,25GHz (1,28V)
Motherboard X99 SOC Champion (BIOS F23c + bifurcation mod)
Cooling Thermalright Venomous-X + 2x Delta 38mm PWM (Push-Pull)
Memory Patriot Viper Steel 4000MHz CL16 4x8GB (@3240MHz CL12.12.12.24 CR2T @ 1,48V)
Video Card(s) Titan Xp Star Wars «Empire» edition
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB NVMe, 1x WD10EZEX (1TB), 2x HGST HUS726060ALE610 (6TB)
Display(s) LG 27GP950-B
Case Fractal Design Meshify 2 XL
Audio Device(s) Motu M4 (audio interface) + ATH-A900Z + Behringer C-1
Power Supply Seasonic X-760 (760W)
Mouse Logitech RX-250
Keyboard HP KB-9970
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V10/display.php?id=157143230295

NV cards with Turbo Boost 3.0 will boost to whatever highest frequency and voltage (in this exact order), they see on F/V curve (limited to Vrel on BIOS side per NV spec).
You can’t have ANY points on frequency higher than what your desired voltage is (flat line).
Otherwise your card can boost to max Vrel regardless of what you will set.

Increasing lower voltage point to be higher frequency than all points after it — is the simplest way to do this.
If you don’t like it, just lower frequency on all points after certain one, so that they won’t have higher frequency than it. That way, card will bypass them when boosting, and voltage GPU will use will be limited to value from that «certain poi
nt» (as can be seen on video you pointed to in first post).

Here’s example of my downvolt F/V curve (it’s «oc’ed», because it’s stable at this frequency and this voltage) :

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient,

There are multiple ways to undervolt, that is one method where you up the core clock, and lower the maximum power target. I use a method where you pick one spot in the curve to be your top clock and can leave power untouched.

CTRL+F brings up the voltage curve. What I do is then hold CRTL and grab a point and drag the entire line down, then choose your undervolt target point, lets say its 825mv, drag that single point up to the desired speed, lets say 1830mhz and hit apply on the main MSI AB window, every point to the right of the one you applied should now be a flat line.

Companies like NVIDIA need to design and ship the cards with settings that work for absolutely everyone. So they need to have a clock/voltage curve that errs on the side of caution for stabilities sake. This does not take into account individual GPU variances and your win in the ‘silicone lottery’. It’s very easy with Ampere cards to achieve stock performance with a good undervolt.

NV cards with Turbo Boost 3.0 will boost to whatever highest frequency and voltage (in this exact order), they see on F/V curve (limited to Vrel on BIOS side per NV spec).
You can’t have ANY points on frequency higher than what your desired voltage is (flat line).
Otherwise your card can boost to max Vrel regardless of what you will set.

Increasing lower voltage point to be higher frequency than all points after it — is the simplest way to do this.
If you don’t like it, just lower frequency on all points after certain one, so that they won’t have higher frequency than it. That way, card will bypass them when boosting, and voltage GPU will use will be limited to value from that «certain poi
nt» (as can be seen on video you pointed to in first post).

Here’s example of my downvolt F/V curve (it’s «oc’ed», because it’s stable at this frequency and this voltage) :

^ I also do it this way
You *must* have a flat line for it to work. Reset your clocks in AB, set it to minus clocks (as low as it goes) and then you can use ctrl-click and drag to raise the voltage you want, to the clocks you want.

1.6GHz lets me run every game at 120FPS+ (most need FPS capped to prevent it passing the 165Hz my monitor can display anyway)

I get crazy performance and drop from 350W to 210W:
(Values are max readings over the last 5 hours, most demanding game was dying light 2. i cropped the min/avg out)

1mongus

So are the clock numbers and the voltage numbers equivalents? Let’s say I up the clock speed by 25. Would lowering the voltage curve by 25 be an effective undervolt? And if they are, wouldnt it just the same as stock if I lowered it by the same amount as I overclocked it?

Also, if I decide to overclock before undervolting, would undervolting reduce the stability or performance gain from the overclock?

Thanks for the help everyone.

agent_x007

System Name BOX
Processor Core i7 6950X @ 4,25GHz (1,28V)
Motherboard X99 SOC Champion (BIOS F23c + bifurcation mod)
Cooling Thermalright Venomous-X + 2x Delta 38mm PWM (Push-Pull)
Memory Patriot Viper Steel 4000MHz CL16 4x8GB (@3240MHz CL12.12.12.24 CR2T @ 1,48V)
Video Card(s) Titan Xp Star Wars «Empire» edition
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB NVMe, 1x WD10EZEX (1TB), 2x HGST HUS726060ALE610 (6TB)
Display(s) LG 27GP950-B
Case Fractal Design Meshify 2 XL
Audio Device(s) Motu M4 (audio interface) + ATH-A900Z + Behringer C-1
Power Supply Seasonic X-760 (760W)
Mouse Logitech RX-250
Keyboard HP KB-9970
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V10/display.php?id=157143230295

1) So are the clock numbers and the voltage numbers equivalents?
2) Let’s say I up the clock speed by 25.
2a) Would lowering the voltage curve by 25 be an effective undervolt?
2b) And if they are, wouldnt it just the same as stock if I lowered it by the same amount as I overclocked it?

3) Also, if I decide to overclock before undervolting, would undervolting reduce the stability or performance gain from the overclock?

Thanks for the help everyone.

It’s kind of complicated. but I try to explain.
Ad. 1. Not from GPU side, it always checks Frequency value on F/V curve first, and compares that to a point it operates at now.
Ad. 2. It increases frequency across ALL voltage points by 25MHz (standard «slider» OC)
a) You can’t lower the voltage the same way as you lower the frequency.
Voltages are «fixed» on x-axis, and can’t be adjusted on their position.
Lowering a point on the curve by 25MHz may either make it slower (because frequency is lower), or it will be skipped during standard turbo boost 3.0 card operation (ie. when it’s frequency value is lower than the previous point on the curve).
It does not undervolt it, in anyway.
b) N/A (not applicable)
Ad. 3. If you are overcloking by using core frequency slider on MSI Afterburner — undervolting makes it pointless as it bypasses it completely (you can have one profile for «standard OC», and second one for undervolting).

Y = Frequency, X = Voltage, «+1» = next voltage point :
If (Y+1 > Y), use X(Y+1) as new GPU voltage, repeat «If»;
else Y+1 = Y, use Y(X) as new GPU voltage (ie. don’t change anything), repeat «If»;
else Y+1

Источник

You may also like...

Adblock
detector